10-year experience of early arthritis clinic at a tertiary rheumatology center: achievements and challenges.

OBJECTIVES: To characterize patients evaluated in our Early Arthritis Clinic (EAC) in the first ten years; to assess diagnostic delay and its underlying causes; and to evaluate the level of agreement between the referring physician and the rheumatologist regarding the presence of referral criteria. METHODS: Cross-sectional study including patients attending EAC between 2012 and 2021. Demographic data, provenience, final diagnosis, referral criteria and time related to diagnosis delay were retrieved from clinical files and the Portuguese Registry of Rheumatic Patients (reuma.pt). Characteristics of the patients and the time variables were analysed with descriptive statistical analysis. The agreement between the referring physician and rheumatologist regarding the referral criteria was evaluated using Cohen's Kappa. RESULTS: A total of 440 patients (68.9% females, mean age of 54±16.7 years) were referred, mostly from primary care (71.6%). Inflammatory Rheumatic Disease was diagnosed in 65.7% of the patients, with 58.9% classified as early arthritis. The median time from onset of symptoms to referral for EAC was 76 days (IQR 33.5-144.0); the median time from referral to the first EAC was 34 (IQR 19.0-46.0) days, and the median time from onset of symptoms to first EAC was 114.5 (IQR 66.8-190.3) days (16.3 weeks). Only about 10% were observed by a Rheumatologist before six weeks after symptom onset. The level of agreement between the referring physician and the rheumatologist was slight to fair to clinical criteria and moderate to substantial to laboratory criteria. CONCLUSIONS: A significant delay still is observed in patients with early arthritis suspicion, being the time from onset of symptoms to referral is the most relevant. A low agreement between referral and Rheumatologists suggests that non-rheumatologists education/training is needed. Identifying the barriers that prevent the adequate referral of patients is necessary to define strategies to improve it.

Validation of the Portuguese Version of the Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire.

The Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) was completed with five visual analog scales to assess systemic sclerosis (SSc) called Scleroderma HAQ (SHAQ). We performed a validation of the European Portuguese version of SHAQ for patients with SSc. Patients with different forms of SSc from five Hospital Centers were invited. The reliability of the Portuguese SHAQ was evaluated by internal consistency and by test-retest reliability. Content validity was checked by two rheumatologists and by a panel of patients. Construct validity was assessed by structural validity and by known-groups hypothesis tests. Criterion validity was addressed with selected dimensions from the UCLA GIT 2.0, the SF-36v2, and the EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L. A total of 102 SSc patients agreed to participate, 31 of which answered to the retest. HAQ-DI demonstrated high internal consistency reliability (α = 0.866) and SHAQ also showed high test-retest reliability (ICC 0.61-0.95). We evidenced the unidimensionality of all VASs. HAQ-DI scores were worse in males, patients older than 65 years, and individuals with a diffuse form of SSc. Criterion validity was mainly evidenced through the correlation between the HAQ-DI and SF-36v2 physical summary measure (r = -0.688) and EQ-5D-5L index score (r = -0.723). Likewise, the SHAQ overall disease severity VAS was also correlated with SF-36v2 physical summary measure (r = -0.628). Mental score correlations were smaller. With the exception of the Raynaud's VAS, all the other VASs correlated well with similar clinical variables. This paper provides evidence to demonstrate how reliable and valid the European Portuguese version of SHAQ is, to be used in SSc patients to assess the clinical severity under the perspective of patients.

Creation and Validation of a Portuguese Version of the UCLA Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium Gastrointestinal Tract Instrument.

(1) Background: The UCLA GIT 2.0 questionnaire has been recognized as a feasible and reliable instrument to assess gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms in systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients and their impact on quality of life. The aim of this study was to create and validate UCLA GIT 2.0 for Portuguese patients with SSc. (2) Methods: A multi-center study was conducted enrolling SSc patients. UCLA GIT 2.0 was validated in Portuguese using reliability (internal consistency, item -total correlation, and reproducibility) and validity (content, construct, and criterion) tests. Criterion tests included EQ-5D and SF-36v2. Social-demographic and clinical data were collected. (3) Results: 102 SSc patients were included, 82.4% of them female, and with a mean sample age of 57.0 ± 12.5 years old. The limited form of SSc was present in 62% of the patients and 56.9% had fewer than five years of disease duration. Almost 60% presented with SSc-GI involvement with a negative impact on quality of life. The means for SF-36v2 were 39.3 ± 10.3 in the physical component summary and 47.5 ± 12.1 in the mental component summary. Total GI score, reported as mild in 57.8% of the patients, was highly reliable (ICC = 0.912) and the Cronbach's alpha was 0.954. There was a high correlation between the total GI score and EQ-5D-5L and SF-36v2 scores. (4) Conclusion: The Portuguese version of UCLA GIT 2.0 showed good psychometric properties and can be used in research and clinical practice.